Charles Murray isn't the mathy one, that guy died. Murray is used as an inflection point deliberately by people who don't realize how deeply they're being distracted by him as the shiny object.
It is why equality must be equal under the law and equal in the moral order even though people have differing gifts and talents. It is also why people should take Hirabayashi v US (1943) much more to heart: Distinctions between citizens solely because of their ancestry are by their very nature odious to a free people whose institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality.
It means any practice of racial normalisation should be done away with and actually if you think about things like legacy admissions to various institutes of higher learning should not be allowed either. I am not holding my breath btw.
Charles Murray isn't the mathy one, that guy died. Murray is used as an inflection point deliberately by people who don't realize how deeply they're being distracted by him as the shiny object.
Another option https://johnmcwhorter.substack.com/p/why-charles-murrays-new-book-is-his
It is why equality must be equal under the law and equal in the moral order even though people have differing gifts and talents. It is also why people should take Hirabayashi v US (1943) much more to heart: Distinctions between citizens solely because of their ancestry are by their very nature odious to a free people whose institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality.
It means any practice of racial normalisation should be done away with and actually if you think about things like legacy admissions to various institutes of higher learning should not be allowed either. I am not holding my breath btw.
Is Charles Murray a social "scientist"? http://shameproject.com/profile/charles-murray/